<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Omnia sunt communia &#187; speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/tag/speed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.amrlima.info</link>
	<description>gnu/linux, cultura livre e outras divagações</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Browser benchmarks! Chromium leading but ephy close!</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/821</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/821#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amrlima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Livre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epiphany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.amrlima.info/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was curious to see how faster epiphany with the webkit backend was comparing to Firefox 3.5 since it feels much much faster. A quick google introduced me to a new browser benchmarking service: Peacekeeper. It makes several tests including rendering (of course   ), social websites performance, javascript etc.
The results vary according to the hardware [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious to see how faster epiphany with the webkit backend was comparing to Firefox 3.5 since it feels much much faster. A quick google introduced me to a new browser benchmarking service: <a href="http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action" target="_blank">Peacekeeper</a>. It makes several tests including rendering (of course <img src='http://www.blog.amrlima.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), social websites performance, javascript etc.</p>
<p>The results vary according to the hardware you&#8217;re running of course. So if you make the test you will get different results from the ones I had. Besides epiphany and firefox I decided to try chromium as well. I haven&#8217;t used chromium in linux yet, so I did not new what to expect. Better then words, here are screenshots of the results.</p>
<h3>Firefox 3.5.4</h3>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone" src="https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/281158/blogfiles/peace-firefox.png" alt="" width="537" height="207" /></strong></p>
<h3>Epiphany 2.27.90</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/281158/blogfiles/ephy.png" alt="" width="545" height="261" /></p>
<p><a href="https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/281158/blogfiles/peace-firefox.png"></a></p>
<h3>Chromium 4.0.204.0</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/281158/blogfiles/chromium.png" alt="" width="531" height="212" /></p>
<p>These tests where all done running Ubuntu 9.04 in a P4 with 1GB RAM. It&#8217;s not my main computer, I did during lunch hour at work. I&#8217;ll see how it goes with my Intel Dual Core @ 2.4GHZ.</p>
<p>It seems I&#8217;ll be using chromium more although ephy is doing great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/821/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speedup web pages loading in Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/586</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/586#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amrlima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Livre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.amrlima.info/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a little tip for speeding up loading of websites. In Firefox and derivates install NoScript extension. What I&#8217;m going to say will make some people a little mad. Noscript will block all scripts by default including google analytics, which I find *very* slow to load, so it slows down sites loading speed.
You can add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a little tip for speeding up loading of websites. In Firefox and derivates install <a href="http://noscript.net/" target="_blank">NoScript</a> extension. What I&#8217;m going to say will make some people a little mad. Noscript will block all scripts by default including google analytics, which I find *very* slow to load, so it slows down sites loading speed.</p>
<p>You can add exceptions for the trusted websites that you don&#8217;t mind waiting all the scripts to load.</p>
<p>Of course NoScript is mostly aimed at security and you&#8217;ll be amazed with the amount of (most of the time) useless scripts websites load all the time. With Noscript you get extra security and extra speed.</p>
<p>For people with slow connections and bandwidth limits it can also be a small help.</p>
<p>I also use google analytics but I won&#8217;t be mad if you block on my blog <img src='http://www.blog.amrlima.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.amrlima.info/archives/586/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

